So the close range/high details was what yielded my first results. Good model, just the detail on the wings were lacking, at least for how I wanted it to be.
These were imported and used all high settings on the point creation, but 50% at resolution for the image scaling. These, I believe, gave a much better sparse point cloud then the first one. Then I used all high settings for generating the dense point cloud. That is were I thing something may have got warped or changed, as when it was done creating, the dense cloud didn't seem completely fluid and seems fuzzy, or our of focus on the wings.
Then I tried making the mesh, that you see above, with very high on the poly count, smooth type, 70% water tightness, 30% on smoothness. I didn't use photoconsistency for that model. Tried it an got the result above.
Tried the photoconsistency settings, using the recommended settings for "Mesh with noise, high quality images" and only got a slightly better result.
These were imported and used all high settings on the point creation, but 50% at resolution for the image scaling. These, I believe, gave a much better sparse point cloud then the first one. Then I used all high settings for generating the dense point cloud. That is were I thing something may have got warped or changed, as when it was done creating, the dense cloud didn't seem completely fluid and seems fuzzy, or our of focus on the wings.
Then I tried making the mesh, that you see above, with very high on the poly count, smooth type, 70% water tightness, 30% on smoothness. I didn't use photoconsistency for that model. Tried it an got the result above.
Tried the photoconsistency settings, using the recommended settings for "Mesh with noise, high quality images" and only got a slightly better result.
Comment