Hey, I'm looking for some tips on how to arrange an imaging setup! At current I am achieving acceptable results with a regular grid setup and a diagonal/checkerboard grid setup. I prefer to use the checkerboard grid because it allows me more spacing between my cameras and therefore a wider region of coverage, however one of my coworkers believes that the checkerboard grid will make for tougher match-finding. My coworker believes that the software should have an easier time of finding matches between cameras in cases where the most relevant cameras are located to the left/right or up/down rather than on a diagonal, which is what would be the case in a checkerboard setup. I've attached a few images describing the setups I'm talking about:
Regular grid Checkerboard Grid
I've drawn lines to represent what I imagine as the software search path to find the most relevant camera. If the software searches in a regular grid, I can see how the checkerboard search would at minimum be less efficient but, at the same time, I feel like we (my co-worker and I) are projecting a human search pattern onto the software; if you just rotate the checkerboard by 45 degrees you get another regularly spaced grid:
I read the photography guide (https://www.3dflow.net/zephyr-doc/en...aphyGuide.html) and reviewed the advanced settings for the keypoint matching and the most relevant info I could find was to do with the photo ordering. In the regular grid scenario it seems I could use the 'sequential' or 'approximate grid' settings, but if I'm taking the photos row-wise, only the regular grid setting seems to makes sense for the checkerboard setup. My question is, would 3DF be able to detect the "off-axis" grid for the checkerboard setup, or would this be no better than an unordered setup? I realize that this is irrelevant if, in the checkerboard setup, the cameras on the horizontal and vertical axis have a high degree of overlap, so lets assume that they have ~50-60% overlap.
Sorry if this was a bit long-winded, thanks for your time!
Regular grid Checkerboard Grid
I've drawn lines to represent what I imagine as the software search path to find the most relevant camera. If the software searches in a regular grid, I can see how the checkerboard search would at minimum be less efficient but, at the same time, I feel like we (my co-worker and I) are projecting a human search pattern onto the software; if you just rotate the checkerboard by 45 degrees you get another regularly spaced grid:
I read the photography guide (https://www.3dflow.net/zephyr-doc/en...aphyGuide.html) and reviewed the advanced settings for the keypoint matching and the most relevant info I could find was to do with the photo ordering. In the regular grid scenario it seems I could use the 'sequential' or 'approximate grid' settings, but if I'm taking the photos row-wise, only the regular grid setting seems to makes sense for the checkerboard setup. My question is, would 3DF be able to detect the "off-axis" grid for the checkerboard setup, or would this be no better than an unordered setup? I realize that this is irrelevant if, in the checkerboard setup, the cameras on the horizontal and vertical axis have a high degree of overlap, so lets assume that they have ~50-60% overlap.
Sorry if this was a bit long-winded, thanks for your time!
Comment