34 out of 76 "cameras" used

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • studio3d
    3Dfollower
    • Jan 2019
    • 10

    34 out of 76 "cameras" used

    Using a t7i w 60mm macro lens to shoot turntable object. With default, it only used 34 or 76 images (seemed to reject all the front images!). With Deep, it used 70 of 76. Why is it rejecting some views and what can I do about it? (Zephyr Lite) thanks
  • cam3d
    3Dflover
    • Sep 2017
    • 682

    #2
    Hi Studio3d - If you share a couple of the original pics I'd be happy to give you indepth feedback on how you can improve your alignment

    Comment

    • Andrea Alessi
      3Dflow Staff
      • Oct 2013
      • 1335

      #3
      hi studio3d,

      most likely when it works with deep but not with default, it's either because the subject isn't very textured or there isn't enough overlap between the images.

      However it's hard to tell without taking a look at the images - as Cam pointed out, if you'd like to share the photos with us we'll be happy to take a look at your dataset!

      Comment

      • studio3d
        3Dfollower
        • Jan 2019
        • 10

        #4
        That would be SO helpful! I've got the 76 images in my Dropbox... https://www.dropbox.com/sh/kguvh8d5t...31oyZelZa?dl=0

        Comment

        • Andrea Alessi
          3Dflow Staff
          • Oct 2013
          • 1335

          #5
          Hi!

          I had a look at your dataset!

          The issue here is mostly noise. You shot with Iso-1600 - if you zoom in and see your images at 100%, you'll see how noisy your images are. That's a problem cause that will cause a lot of false matches. You can use the Tools -> Workspace -> Matches viewer tool to see how many matches are made fro image to image. You'll see that there are very few, and this makes difficult for zephyr placing all cameras.

          When images are not sharp, you'll have to use more aggressive settings, such as Deep rather than default.

          However, i recommend using better photos if possible in order to get the best results with 3DF Zephyr - since you're shooting with turntable, two tips

          1. use a tripod when possible - rather than shooting 1/60s f/14 Iso-1600, try using a different exposure settings - when shooting indoors for example i generally try using 1 or 2 seconds, Iso-100 and even f/22 for a better depth of field. It really depends on your lighting - if you're using long exposure, make sure to use a remote (or the countdown) so that you pressing the camera doesn't move it.

          2. use masking to remove the background (you can do it completetly automatically with 3DF Masquerade) - when background and foreground are no longer coherent, zephyr will get confused as it doesn't know what you want to reconstruct (the wall? the statue?)

          If you have a few minutes, I suggest you take a look at these tutorials:

          photography for photogrammetry : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E06k...ature=youtu.be

          masking for turntable scenarios : https://www.3dflow.net/technology/do...for-turntable/

          As for the amount of images / overlap, it looks good - you just need sharper photos

          Cheers,
          Andrea

          Comment

          • studio3d
            3Dfollower
            • Jan 2019
            • 10

            #6
            Thanks for your helpful hints, Andrea! My sharpest lens is the 60mm, but the suggestion on .pdf is to use 18-35... I have a zoom lens that can cover that, but it's the "kit" lens. On a tripod, it will be better of course! With the paper background, do I still need to use masking? I will also look at tutorials... Glad to know about "matches" viewer. This should look great when done right

            Comment

            • cam3d
              3Dflover
              • Sep 2017
              • 682

              #7
              studio3d

              Andrea covered most of the important points - Just wanted to add, if you end up using your zoom lens, make sure you tape it so it stays at a single focal length, mixing focal lengths can complicate things a little and confuse the alignment. 60mm lens is perfectly fine, it depends more on the size of the object. For small things, a higher focal length is almost always needed (I use 100mm on insects and other tiny things)

              You'll definitely see a noticeable improvement with a low iso, and if you're going for ultimate sharpness, you can use a DOF calculator https://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tu...calculator.htm to calculate optimal f/stop - Here is some interesting reading if you want to go deep: https://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tu...hotography.htm

              Comment

              • studio3d
                3Dfollower
                • Jan 2019
                • 10

                #8
                Click image for larger version

Name:	57_of_57.png
Views:	745
Size:	901.6 KB
ID:	4456 I reshot the Lennon statue w iso200 1/2 sec f/20... used the jpgs which looked fine, and all 57 of 57 images were used... BUT the Sparse Point Cloud looked very odd, and when I tried to make a Dense Cloud the program hung up about 90% through. Here are the new photos... thanks. https://www.dropbox.com/sh/zmgxglobh...HdtsnYILa?dl=0

                Comment

                • cam3d
                  3Dflover
                  • Sep 2017
                  • 682

                  #9
                  Hey Studio3d -

                  You're going to need to mask your images! - The image quality is much better now, so 3DF Zephyr has picked up on the background and aligned the cameras to that, instead of the actual subject. This is due to the DOF reaching further. You can quickly mask in Masquerade using the mask by colour feature

                  Comment

                  • studio3d
                    3Dfollower
                    • Jan 2019
                    • 10

                    #10
                    OK, thanks... I will try the masking (though since the background has no texture whatsoever, I don't understand why masking is needed.)

                    Comment

                    • AvionAvionics
                      3Dflourished
                      • Nov 2017
                      • 76

                      #11
                      studio3d give it a try, I was hoping to avoid masking at first but the time i spent masking has made up for the time needed for deeper or additional scans. Not only that the masking is quite painless

                      Comment

                      • studio3d
                        3Dfollower
                        • Jan 2019
                        • 10

                        #12
                        Maybe I'm not doing it right, but masking is not painless! I tried to pick by color, but I had to add areas and subtract areas. Thought I could apply to all the images, but that sure didn't work! If I have to go in and mask all 57 images individually that would be very painful! I did a similar dataset on same background through Autodesk Recap and it AUTOMATICALLY ignored the background. I don't like paying subscription or "cloud points", so I was hoping Zephyr would be the answer...

                        Comment

                        • AvionAvionics
                          3Dflourished
                          • Nov 2017
                          • 76

                          #13
                          Someone may have a better answer than me but I did the same as their tutorial.

                          Where I used the red brush to get the main object and the blue to ignore the background (turned on the turntable and always applied mask to next image) (Now i wasn't 100% perfect on my mask) but this route took me about 1-2 hours to do 135 images. It isnt automatic but it gave me results that not even deep scan could achieve by itself.

                          Comment

                          • studio3d
                            3Dfollower
                            • Jan 2019
                            • 10

                            #14
                            I just tried the same dataset in Agisoft Photoscan and got a very good model (needs some fixup) with zero masking. That's painless!

                            Comment

                            Working...