Hello,
i like a lot 3dzephyr but sometimes i get results that discourage me
i use 3dzephyr free and my smartphone huawei p8 max, that has a 12mpix good quality camera
yesterday evening i did a try, taking 50 snapshots of a chair and processing them with 3dzephyr
i selected 'fast project' processing, with default settings
and after i retried with 'deep' sparse cloud creation and 'high details' dense point cloud creation
i thought to get good results because the chair is a static subject, and it was placed in a place with backgroud and ground rich of details to be get as reference points by the program
BUT the results were not good: whole legs, or part of legs were missing , and big holes were present in the final mesh:
example dense point cloud:
example mesh:
This is the set of photos:
example photo:
As you can see in the final 3dzephyr screenshots, all the photos were matched, the program did not discard any of them,
but the results are not good.
why?
i wonder if it is mainly a camera problem or an illumination problem or a subjet problem
do you think that with a good canon dslr i could get better results?
thank you!
i like a lot 3dzephyr but sometimes i get results that discourage me
i use 3dzephyr free and my smartphone huawei p8 max, that has a 12mpix good quality camera
yesterday evening i did a try, taking 50 snapshots of a chair and processing them with 3dzephyr
i selected 'fast project' processing, with default settings
and after i retried with 'deep' sparse cloud creation and 'high details' dense point cloud creation
i thought to get good results because the chair is a static subject, and it was placed in a place with backgroud and ground rich of details to be get as reference points by the program
BUT the results were not good: whole legs, or part of legs were missing , and big holes were present in the final mesh:
example dense point cloud:
example mesh:
This is the set of photos:
example photo:
As you can see in the final 3dzephyr screenshots, all the photos were matched, the program did not discard any of them,
but the results are not good.
why?
i wonder if it is mainly a camera problem or an illumination problem or a subjet problem
do you think that with a good canon dslr i could get better results?
thank you!
Comment